Jupiter review
Jupiter is a Loan Origination product from Lendesk Technologies ULC. MortgageTechReview scores Jupiter 3.7 out of 5.0, ranking Jupiter #13 of the 32 products tracked in Loan Origination Software, as of August 11, 2026. Scores on MortgageTechReview are weighted across five axes and are never paid for or influenced by a vendor relationship.
Broker-focused LOS launched by Rocket Pro in partnership with Lendesk at Rocket Pro's Ignite26 event in February 2026. Brokers operate under their own branding and can submit to Rocket or to any other lender. Covers digital applications, automated document requests, credit, AUS, disclosures, e-signature, and loan package assembly.
How Jupiter compares to Encompass
Ranked first in LOSEncompass currently scores highest in LOS, so every other product in the category is compared against it here. That is a ranking on our published rubric rather than a recommendation, and it changes when the scores change. Category Leader
| Axis | Jupiter | Encompass |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 3.6 | 4.9 |
| Functionality & depth | 3.6 | 4.9 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 3.5 | 4.9 |
| Adoption & support | 4.0 | 4.4 |
| Return on spend | 4.0 | 3.9 |
| Overall | 3.7 | 4.7 |
Jupiter wins 1 of 5 axes against Encompass, on the weight profile published for this category. Full head-to-head →
Where it wins
- Built-in credit and AUS with DU and LPA run directly in the platform, and no upfront cost. You pay when the loan funds. For a small broker that beats paying per seat regardless of volume.
- Smart Docs requests the right documents, tracks progress and follows up. Messy uploads become complete files without manual chasing.
- One-click submission to Rocket Pro, or a clean 1003 export to any lender you choose. It is not a closed system.
- Mortgage Call Report generation built into the dashboard, which small shops usually assemble by hand.
- Fully branded borrower portal, with two-factor authentication and secure consent. Early user testimony includes brokers leaving Calyx after a decade.
Where it falls short
- Rocket sponsors it, and Rocket is a lender you compete with or submit to. Running your whole pipeline on a system backed by one of your outlets is a real strategic question. It supports other lenders, but the question stands.
- Launched February 2026. Almost no independent review data and no track record through a rate cycle.
- Brokers only. No retail, banked, or correspondent path.
- Pricing beyond the pay-at-funding credit and AUS model is not published.
Why it scores 3.7
Scored on the Loan Origination Systems weight profile. The number shows where it sits in this category. It rests on evidence anyone can check, including the vendor's own record. The weights →
Production impact
25% of scoreThe file moves from intake to a wholesale lender without a processor chasing it. Smart Docs requests the right documents, tracks progress and follows up on its own. One-click submission to Rocket Pro removes the reupload step that eats broker time, and credit, DU and LPA run in the platform rather than across three tabs. It launched February 2026, so there is no published cycle-time data to check any of it against.
Functionality and depth
20% of scoreA branded borrower portal with two-factor authentication, document handling, a workflow view, lender submission, disclosures, e-signature and loan package assembly. Credit and automated underwriting run inside the platform, which is more than most broker tools manage, and Mortgage Call Report generation sits in the dashboard instead of being assembled by hand. Against what the LOS category covers it is still thin: brokers only, no secondary marketing, no servicing handoff.
Integrations and ecosystem
25% of scoreCredit, DU and LPA run in the platform, and one-click submission goes to Rocket Pro. Everything else leaves as a 1003 export, which works but is not an integration. A broker submitting across many wholesalers does the reupload on every file not going to Rocket. And the one lender wired in is the lender sponsoring the platform, which you may also compete with. Whether you want your pipeline running there is worth settling before you sign.
Adoption and support
20% of scoreRemoving seat fees and annual contracts removes the two things that stall LOS adoption in small shops. Sign-up is self-serve rather than sales-gated. A public help center and an onboarding page exist, so the vendor expects users to get themselves live. A named user at Crossview Mortgage calls it intuitive, a vendor-selected testimonial rather than independent evidence.
Return on spend
10% of scoreNo upfront cost. You pay when the loan funds, which turns a fixed seat cost into a variable one, and that is the right shape for a broker with an uneven pipeline. Near the top of this category on value. Early user testimony includes brokers leaving Calyx after a decade. The gap: no rate is published beyond the pay-at-funding model, so the crossover against a seat-priced rival cannot be calculated before a sales call.
On price. The site states no seat fees and no annual contracts. Credit and automated underwriting run on a pay-per-fund basis. No dollar figure appears anywhere. The broker terms say fees are set at sign-up and allow changes on seven days’ written notice.
