Consolidated Analytics review
Consolidated Analytics is a Mortgage Technology Consultants and Advisory Firms product from Consolidated Analytics, Inc. (reported Eos Partners portfolio). MortgageTechReview scores Consolidated Analytics 2.9 out of 5.0, ranking Consolidated Analytics #7 of the 9 products tracked in Mortgage Technology Consultants and Advisory Firms, as of August 11, 2026. Scores on MortgageTechReview are weighted across five axes and are never paid for or influenced by a vendor relationship.
Consolidated Analytics has real weight in due diligence and valuations. We could not confirm the systems selection line is still active. It owns and sells its own mortgage technology platform, which puts it on both sides of any technology talk. A third-party directory reports private equity backing; the company itself discloses no ownership.
How Consolidated Analytics compares to STRATMOR Group
Ranked first in ADVISORYSTRATMOR Group currently scores highest in ADVISORY, so every other product in the category is compared against it here. That is a ranking on our published rubric rather than a recommendation, and it changes when the scores change. Category Leader
| Axis | Consolidated Analytics | STRATMOR Group |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 3.0 | 4.9 |
| Functionality & depth | 3.2 | 4.9 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 2.6 | 4.4 |
| Adoption & support | 3.0 | 4.9 |
| Return on spend | 3.0 | 4.9 |
| Overall | 2.9 | 4.8 |
Consolidated Analytics wins 0 of 5 axes against STRATMOR Group, on the weight profile published for this category. Full head-to-head →
Where it wins
- Real scale in due diligence and valuation work
- Broad business process capability alongside the advisory work
- Established with investors as well as lenders
Where it falls short
- Owns and sells its own mortgage technology platform
- Systems selection offering could not be confirmed as active
- Ownership reported only by a third-party directory, not by the company
- No published benchmarking data
Why it scores 2.9
Scored on the Advisory & Consulting weight profile. The number shows where it sits in this category. It rests on evidence anyone can check, including the vendor's own record. The weights →
Production impact
25% of scoreStrong in its core lines; the technology selection work is less evidenced.
Functionality and depth
25% of scoreThe advisory line sits inside a broad services organisation. Due diligence and valuation work run alongside, plus wider business process services.
Independence and market position (2.4). It owns a mortgage technology platform and advises on technology, which is a conflict. Teraverde carries the same conflict; here there is no offsetting freedom from other vendor ties.
Adoption and support
10% of scoreThe firm is built around delivery.
Return on spend
10% of scoreNothing is disclosed.
