BlackFin Group vs Consolidated Analytics
Advisory & Consulting head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
BlackFin Group
Consolidated Analytics, Inc. (reported Eos Partners portfolio)
| Axis | BlackFin Group | Consolidated Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 3.3 | 3.0 |
| Functionality & depth | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 2.3 | 2.6 |
| Adoption & support | 3.3 | 3.0 |
| Return on spend | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| Overall | 3.0 | 2.9 |
BlackFin Group wins 4 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
What the rubric says
BlackFin Group and Consolidated Analytics are both scored in Advisory & Consulting. BlackFin Group carries an overall of 3, Consolidated Analytics an overall of 2.9. The widest gap between them is Return on spend, at 0.5 of a point. That axis measures what the spend returns, which is not the same as being cheap. BlackFin Group takes it, 3.5 to 3.
Where the five axes separate
On Return on spend the record favours BlackFin Group, 3.5 against 3. On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Consolidated Analytics, 2.6 against 2.3. On Production impact the record favours BlackFin Group, 3.3 against 3. On Adoption and support the record favours BlackFin Group, 3.3 against 3. On Functionality and depth the record favours BlackFin Group, 3.3 against 3.2.
In Advisory & Consulting the rubric weights Integrations and ecosystem heaviest, at 30 percent. That is why the two overalls sit where they do.
How the weights turn axes into a score
Production impact carries 25 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures whether the tool moves volume, pull-through or cycle time. Functionality and depth carries 25 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures whether it handles the messy loans and not just the clean file. Integrations and ecosystem carries 30 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures how well it reaches the rest of the stack. Adoption and support carries 10 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures whether the team adopts it and gets unstuck. Return on spend carries 10 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures what the spend returns, which is not the same as being cheap.
Pricing posture
BlackFin Group does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, fee structure not published. Consolidated Analytics does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, fee structure not published.
Deployment and who each one targets
Segment focus for BlackFin Group: Mid-market lenders and credit unions. Segment focus for Consolidated Analytics: Lenders, investors and servicers. The two entries name different buyers.
What each record credits
BlackFin Group: Explicit published anti-conflict pledge, which few competitors offer. BlackFin Group: Tech Stack Navigator priced as an alternative to expensive RFP consulting. BlackFin Group: Broad practice spanning selection, implementation, AI and data. BlackFin Group: Published pricing on at least one advisory product, which is rare here. Consolidated Analytics: Real scale in due diligence and valuation work. Consolidated Analytics: Broad business process capability alongside the advisory work. Consolidated Analytics: Established with investors as well as lenders.
What each record holds against them
BlackFin Group: Preferred Partners get recommended inside its own selection product. BlackFin Group: Named partners include LOS and verification vendors that would be selection candidates. BlackFin Group: Has taken vendor-side money as a training partner. BlackFin Group: Partner program economics are not disclosed. Consolidated Analytics: Owns and sells its own mortgage technology platform. Consolidated Analytics: Systems selection offering could not be confirmed as active. Consolidated Analytics: Ownership reported only by a third-party directory, not by the company. Consolidated Analytics: No published benchmarking data.
Which one fits which shop
Best fit for BlackFin Group: Lenders wanting selection work at a lower price point. Best fit for Consolidated Analytics: Due diligence and valuation work rather than systems selection.
What each entry concludes
BlackFin Group: The sharpest tension in this category sits inside one firm. BlackFin Group: BlackFin publishes the most explicit anti-conflict pledge here, refusing revenue share and kickbacks. BlackFin Group: It refuses conflicted board seats too, and it attacks consultants with a vested interest in the outcome. BlackFin Group: Yet its Preferred Partners are described as qualified and recommended inside its own Tech Stack Navigator selection product. BlackFin Group: It has also taken money from a loan origination vendor as a training partner, all on the record. Consolidated Analytics: Consolidated Analytics has real weight in due diligence and valuations. Consolidated Analytics: We could not confirm the systems selection line is still active. Consolidated Analytics: It owns and sells its own mortgage technology platform, which puts it on both sides of any technology. Consolidated Analytics: A third-party directory reports private equity backing; the company itself discloses no ownership.
The short answer
BlackFin Group finishes ahead on the published rubric, 3 to 2.9. The margin comes mostly from Return on spend. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →