Richey May vs Consolidated Analytics
Advisory & Consulting head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
Richey, May & Co., LLP and RM Advisory LLC (F3 Partners backed)
Consolidated Analytics, Inc. (reported Eos Partners portfolio)
| Axis | Richey May | Consolidated Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 4.4 | 3.0 |
| Functionality & depth | 4.5 | 3.2 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 3.2 | 2.6 |
| Adoption & support | 4.4 | 3.0 |
| Return on spend | 3.7 | 3.0 |
| Overall | 4.0 | 2.9 |
Richey May wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
What the rubric says
Richey May and Consolidated Analytics are both scored in Advisory & Consulting. Richey May carries an overall of 4, Consolidated Analytics an overall of 2.9. The widest gap between them is Production impact, at 1.4 of a point. That axis measures whether the tool moves volume, pull-through or cycle time. Richey May takes it, 4.4 to 3.
Where the five axes separate
On Production impact the record favours Richey May, 4.4 against 3. On Adoption and support the record favours Richey May, 4.4 against 3. On Functionality and depth the record favours Richey May, 4.5 against 3.2. On Return on spend the record favours Richey May, 3.7 against 3. On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Richey May, 3.2 against 2.6.
In Advisory & Consulting the rubric weights Integrations and ecosystem heaviest, at 30 percent. That is why the two overalls sit where they do.
How the weights turn axes into a score
Production impact carries 25 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures whether the tool moves volume, pull-through or cycle time. Functionality and depth carries 25 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures whether it handles the messy loans and not just the clean file. Integrations and ecosystem carries 30 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures how well it reaches the rest of the stack. Adoption and support carries 10 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures whether the team adopts it and gets unstuck. Return on spend carries 10 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures what the spend returns, which is not the same as being cheap.
Pricing posture
Richey May does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, fee structure not published. Consolidated Analytics does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, fee structure not published.
Deployment and who each one targets
Segment focus for Richey May: Independent mortgage banks of all sizes. Segment focus for Consolidated Analytics: Lenders, investors and servicers. The two entries name different buyers.
What each record credits
Richey May: Over 600 employees and 50 partners, the deepest bench here. Richey May: Lender compensation survey and peer benchmarking data. Richey May: Audit, tax, technology and cyber under one firm cuts coordination cost. Richey May: CPA independence rules impose real constraints on attest clients. Consolidated Analytics: Real scale in due diligence and valuation work. Consolidated Analytics: Broad business process capability alongside the advisory work. Consolidated Analytics: Established with investors as well as lenders.
What each record holds against them
Richey May: Sells SOC audits to the same vendors lenders ask it to evaluate. Richey May: Analytics offering rides on one named vendor platform. Richey May: Private equity backed since 2025, which changes incentives. Richey May: Owns acquired technology businesses, so it sits partly on the vendor side. Consolidated Analytics: Owns and sells its own mortgage technology platform. Consolidated Analytics: Systems selection offering could not be confirmed as active. Consolidated Analytics: Ownership reported only by a third-party directory, not by the company. Consolidated Analytics: No published benchmarking data.
Which one fits which shop
Best fit for Richey May: Lenders wanting one firm across audit, tax and technology. Best fit for Consolidated Analytics: Due diligence and valuation work rather than systems selection.
What each entry concludes
Richey May: Richey May has a large bench, and the broadest service range. Richey May: That is both the appeal and the problem. Richey May: It sells technology advisory to lenders while selling SOC audits to the vendor population. Richey May: Its analytics product is built on a single named technology partner. Richey May: It publishes lender guidance on using SOC reports for vendor management. Consolidated Analytics: Consolidated Analytics has real weight in due diligence and valuations. Consolidated Analytics: We could not confirm the systems selection line is still active. Consolidated Analytics: It owns and sells its own mortgage technology platform, which puts it on both sides of any technology. Consolidated Analytics: A third-party directory reports private equity backing; the company itself discloses no ownership.
The short answer
Richey May finishes ahead on the published rubric, 4 to 2.9. The margin comes mostly from Production impact. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →