Consolidated Analytics vs Falcon Capital Advisors
Advisory & Consulting head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
Consolidated Analytics, Inc. (reported Eos Partners portfolio)
Falcon Capital Advisors
| Axis | Consolidated Analytics | Falcon Capital Advisors |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 3.0 | 2.8 |
| Functionality & depth | 3.2 | 2.8 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 2.6 | 1.8 |
| Adoption & support | 3.0 | 2.8 |
| Return on spend | 3.0 | 2.8 |
| Overall | 2.9 | 2.5 |
Consolidated Analytics wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
What the rubric says
Consolidated Analytics and Falcon Capital Advisors are both scored in Advisory & Consulting. Consolidated Analytics carries an overall of 2.9, Falcon Capital Advisors an overall of 2.5. The widest gap between them is Integrations and ecosystem, at 0.8 of a point. That axis measures how well it reaches the rest of the stack. Consolidated Analytics takes it, 2.6 to 1.8.
Where the five axes separate
On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Consolidated Analytics, 2.6 against 1.8. On Functionality and depth the record favours Consolidated Analytics, 3.2 against 2.8. On Return on spend the record favours Consolidated Analytics, 3 against 2.8. On Production impact the record favours Consolidated Analytics, 3 against 2.8. On Adoption and support the record favours Consolidated Analytics, 3 against 2.8.
In Advisory & Consulting the rubric weights Integrations and ecosystem heaviest, at 30 percent. That is why the two overalls sit where they do.
How the weights turn axes into a score
Production impact carries 25 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures whether the tool moves volume, pull-through or cycle time. Functionality and depth carries 25 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures whether it handles the messy loans and not just the clean file. Integrations and ecosystem carries 30 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures how well it reaches the rest of the stack. Adoption and support carries 10 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures whether the team adopts it and gets unstuck. Return on spend carries 10 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures what the spend returns, which is not the same as being cheap.
Pricing posture
Consolidated Analytics does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, fee structure not published. Falcon Capital Advisors does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, fee structure not published.
Deployment and who each one targets
Segment focus for Consolidated Analytics: Lenders, investors and servicers. Segment focus for Falcon Capital Advisors: Lenders and government agencies pursuing digital closing. The two entries name different buyers.
What each record credits
Consolidated Analytics: Real scale in due diligence and valuation work. Consolidated Analytics: Broad business process capability alongside the advisory work. Consolidated Analytics: Established with investors as well as lenders. Falcon Capital Advisors: Real specialist depth in eClosing and MERS eRegistry work. Falcon Capital Advisors: Government and agency experience alongside lender work. Falcon Capital Advisors: Discloses its vendor-side work openly on its own site.
What each record holds against them
Consolidated Analytics: Owns and sells its own mortgage technology platform. Consolidated Analytics: Systems selection offering could not be confirmed as active. Consolidated Analytics: Ownership reported only by a third-party directory, not by the company. Consolidated Analytics: No published benchmarking data. Falcon Capital Advisors: Advises lenders on vendor selection while advising those same vendors. Falcon Capital Advisors: Holds a certification role over product categories it advises. Falcon Capital Advisors: No conflict management or independence statement published. Falcon Capital Advisors: Basic facts like founding year and ownership are not published.
Which one fits which shop
Best fit for Consolidated Analytics: Due diligence and valuation work rather than systems selection. Best fit for Falcon Capital Advisors: eClosing and eVault programs specifically.
What each entry concludes
Consolidated Analytics: Consolidated Analytics has real weight in due diligence and valuations. Consolidated Analytics: We could not confirm the systems selection line is still active. Consolidated Analytics: It owns and sells its own mortgage technology platform, which puts it on both sides of any technology. Consolidated Analytics: A third-party directory reports private equity backing; the company itself discloses no ownership. Falcon Capital Advisors: Falcon pairs genuine digital closing depth with the most conflicted structure in this category. Falcon Capital Advisors: Its own services page says it advises lenders on vendor selection and advises technology providers on building. Falcon Capital Advisors: It also works with MISMO to certify eMortgage technology providers. Falcon Capital Advisors: All three roles are disclosed by the firm. Falcon Capital Advisors: No conflict management statement accompanies them.
The short answer
Consolidated Analytics finishes ahead on the published rubric, 2.9 to 2.5. The margin comes mostly from Integrations and ecosystem. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →