TENA Companies vs Digital Risk
Compliance & QC head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
Compliance & QC
Mphasis
| Axis | TENA Companies | Digital Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Functionality & depth | 4.0 | 3.3 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 2.6 | 2.8 |
| Adoption & support | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| Return on spend | 3.7 | 3.0 |
| Overall | 3.5 | 3.1 |
TENA Companies wins 3 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
What the rubric says
TENA Companies and Digital Risk are both scored in Compliance & QC. TENA Companies carries an overall of 3.5, Digital Risk an overall of 3.1. The widest gap between them is Return on spend, at 0.7 of a point. That axis measures what the spend returns, which is not the same as being cheap. TENA Companies takes it, 3.7 to 3.
Where the five axes separate
On Return on spend the record favours TENA Companies, 3.7 against 3. On Functionality and depth the record favours TENA Companies, 4 against 3.3. On Adoption and support the record favours TENA Companies, 3.5 against 3.
Pricing posture
TENA Companies does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, with audit services and secondlook software licensed separately. Digital Risk does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, variable and typically per loan.
Deployment and who each one targets
Deployment for TENA Companies: SECONDLOOK audit software with the TENA Web Services cloud portal for remediation and reporting. Deployment for Digital Risk: Delivered as a managed service on vendor-operated platforms. Segment focus for TENA Companies: Small and mid-size lenders and servicers, plus in-house QC teams licensing the audit engine. Segment focus for Digital Risk: Large lenders and investors outsourcing QC, due diligence, and fulfilment capacity. The two entries name different buyers.
What each record credits
TENA Companies: Thousands of prewritten test questions, maintained by TENA’s own legal team. Digital Risk: Capacity scales with volume without the lender hiring or firing QC staff.
What each record holds against them
TENA Companies: No LOS, imaging or document integration is named, leaving file ingest undocumented. Digital Risk: Not licensable software; the named platforms come with the service, not for sale.
Which one fits which shop
Best fit for TENA Companies: An in-house QC team that needs maintained federal, state and agency test content it does. Best fit for Digital Risk: A lender that needs QC and due diligence capacity now without hiring for it.
The short answer
TENA Companies finishes ahead on the published rubric, 3.5 to 3.1. The margin comes mostly from Return on spend. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →