Stavvy vs NotaryCam
Documents & eClosing head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
Stavvy, Inc.
Stewart
| Axis | Stavvy | NotaryCam |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 3.8 | 3.0 |
| Functionality & depth | 4.4 | 3.0 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 3.6 | 2.8 |
| Adoption & support | 3.8 | 3.1 |
| Return on spend | 3.6 | 2.8 |
| Overall | 3.9 | 2.9 |
Stavvy wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
What the rubric says
Stavvy and NotaryCam are both scored in Documents & eClosing. Stavvy carries an overall of 3.9, NotaryCam an overall of 2.9. The widest gap between them is Functionality and depth, at 1.4 of a point. That axis measures whether it handles the messy loans and not just the clean file. Stavvy takes it, 4.4 to 3.
Where the five axes separate
On Functionality and depth the record favours Stavvy, 4.4 against 3. On Return on spend the record favours Stavvy, 3.6 against 2.8. On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Stavvy, 3.6 against 2.8. On Production impact the record favours Stavvy, 3.8 against 3. On Adoption and support the record favours Stavvy, 3.8 against 3.1.
Pricing posture
Stavvy does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only. NotaryCam does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only.
Deployment and who each one targets
Deployment for Stavvy: Cloud, Encompass Partner Connect API. Deployment for NotaryCam: Cloud, API, licensed notary software for enterprises. Segment focus for Stavvy: Lenders, servicers, title agents and real estate law firms wanting closing and default work on one. Segment focus for NotaryCam: Lenders and title companies needing remote and in-person electronic notarization with underwriter backing. The two entries name different buyers.
What each record credits
Stavvy: Default servicing and origination closings run on one platform after the 2023 Brace deal. Stavvy: PHH Mortgage went live on its loan modification product in September 2025. Stavvy: The February 2025 Encompass integration uses Partner Connect, the current ICE path. NotaryCam: Backed by Stewart, a national title underwriter, answering acceptance and insurability. NotaryCam: Covers both RON and in-person electronic notarization, so no forced model. NotaryCam: Separate licensing models serve enterprises and independent notaries.
What each record holds against them
Stavvy: No pricing appears anywhere, not even a per-closing fee. Stavvy: Beyond Encompass, the site names no other system and publishes no integrations page. Stavvy: Funding and ownership go undisclosed on the site and the press page. NotaryCam: No pricing figures are published anywhere on the site. NotaryCam: Only one software partner named, with no title production system or LOS listed. NotaryCam: Marketing spans eight industries, which dilutes the mortgage-specific story.
Which one fits which shop
Best fit for Stavvy: A servicer that needs loss mitigation documents executed remotely as well as originations closed. Best fit for NotaryCam: Lenders who want notarization backed by a national title underwriter rather than a standalone startup.
What each entry concludes
Stavvy: Stavvy closes loans and also works the servicing side, which sets it apart in this category. Stavvy: It sells hybrid and full eClosing, eNote and eVault custody, RON and in-person electronic notarization. NotaryCam: NotaryCam sells remote online notarization, in-person electronic notarization, identity verification and eSignature, backed by Stewart Title. NotaryCam: That parentage is the substance of the pitch.
The short answer
Stavvy finishes ahead on the published rubric, 3.9 to 2.9. The margin comes mostly from Functionality and depth. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →