Stavvy vs Asurity Propel
Documents & eClosing head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
Stavvy, Inc.
Asurity
| Axis | Stavvy | Asurity Propel |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 3.8 | 3.3 |
| Functionality & depth | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 3.6 | 3.1 |
| Adoption & support | 3.8 | 3.1 |
| Return on spend | 3.6 | 3.3 |
| Overall | 3.9 | 3.2 |
Stavvy wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
What the rubric says
Stavvy and Asurity Propel are both scored in Documents & eClosing. Stavvy carries an overall of 3.9, Asurity Propel an overall of 3.2. The widest gap between them is Functionality and depth, at 1.1 of a point. That axis measures whether it handles the messy loans and not just the clean file. Stavvy takes it, 4.4 to 3.3.
Where the five axes separate
On Functionality and depth the record favours Stavvy, 4.4 against 3.3. On Adoption and support the record favours Stavvy, 3.8 against 3.1. On Production impact the record favours Stavvy, 3.8 against 3.3. On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Stavvy, 3.6 against 3.1. On Return on spend the record favours Stavvy, 3.6 against 3.3.
Pricing posture
Stavvy does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only. Asurity Propel does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, demo request required.
Deployment and who each one targets
Deployment for Stavvy: Cloud, Encompass Partner Connect API. Deployment for Asurity Propel: Cloud, LOS integrations. Segment focus for Stavvy: Lenders, servicers, title agents and real estate law firms wanting closing and default work on one. Segment focus for Asurity Propel: Lenders and banks that treat document generation primarily as a compliance problem. The two entries name different buyers.
What each record credits
Stavvy: Default servicing and origination closings run on one platform after the 2023 Brace deal. Stavvy: PHH Mortgage went live on its loan modification product in September 2025. Stavvy: The February 2025 Encompass integration uses Partner Connect, the current ICE path. Asurity Propel: Versioning and audit trails are documented and framed for regulatory examinations. Asurity Propel: Same vendor sells RegCheck, testing loans against TRID, HOEPA, HPML, OFAC and NMLS rules. Asurity Propel: State-specific rules assemble packages instead of manual document selection.
What each record holds against them
Stavvy: No pricing appears anywhere, not even a per-closing fee. Stavvy: Beyond Encompass, the site names no other system and publishes no integrations page. Stavvy: Funding and ownership go undisclosed on the site and the press page. Asurity Propel: No native eSignature or eClosing module; signing routes to DocuSign. Asurity Propel: Logo wall includes dead brand names like Ellie Mae, suggesting a stale page. Asurity Propel: No pricing, tiering or minimum volume information appears anywhere.
Which one fits which shop
Best fit for Stavvy: A servicer that needs loss mitigation documents executed remotely as well as originations closed. Best fit for Asurity Propel: Compliance-led shops that want documents and regulatory testing from the same vendor.
What each entry concludes
Stavvy: Stavvy closes loans and also works the servicing side, which sets it apart in this category. Stavvy: It sells hybrid and full eClosing, eNote and eVault custody, RON and in-person electronic notarization. Asurity Propel: Propel is Asurity’s document generation platform: rules-driven state-specific packages, smart forms, embedded audit checks and versioning aimed. Asurity Propel: It suits lenders whose worry is defensible disclosure and closing paper, not a complete digital closing stack.
The short answer
Stavvy finishes ahead on the published rubric, 3.9 to 3.2. The margin comes mostly from Functionality and depth. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →