Skip to content
Subscribe

myhomeIQ vs Modex

Lead Gen & Retention head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both

All Lead Gen & Retention head-to-heads →

myhomeIQ
SOA Labs, Inc.
4.0
Modex
Modex, Inc.
3.5
AxismyhomeIQModex
Production impact 4.0 3.6
Functionality & depth 4.1 3.6
Integrations & ecosystem 3.2 2.6
Adoption & support 4.1 3.6
Return on spend 4.4 3.8
Overall 4.0 3.5

myhomeIQ wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

What the rubric says

myhomeIQ and Modex are both scored in Lead Gen & Retention. myhomeIQ carries an overall of 4, Modex an overall of 3.5. The widest gap between them is Return on spend, at 0.6 of a point. That axis measures what the spend returns, which is not the same as being cheap. myhomeIQ takes it, 4.4 to 3.8.

Where the five axes separate

On Return on spend the record favours myhomeIQ, 4.4 against 3.8. On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours myhomeIQ, 3.2 against 2.6. On Functionality and depth the record favours myhomeIQ, 4.1 against 3.6. On Adoption and support the record favours myhomeIQ, 4.1 against 3.6. On Production impact the record favours myhomeIQ, 4 against 3.6.

Pricing posture

myhomeIQ publishes pricing. Its listed model is published per-seat pricing, $247 per month or $1,800 per year plus a $200 one-time setup, enterprise. Modex does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only; profiles sold pay-per-hire, recruit sold by subscription. One of the two can be costed before a sales call, the other cannot.

Deployment and who each one targets

Deployment for myhomeIQ: Cloud, database synced from a CRM, LOS or spreadsheet upload. Deployment for Modex: Cloud, self-service search with employer messaging. Segment focus for myhomeIQ: Loan officers running homeowner retention and co-marketing with real estate agent partners. Segment focus for Modex: Mortgage employers recruiting originators, plus wholesale and business development teams targeting brokers. The two entries name different buyers.

What each record credits

myhomeIQ: Real published pricing, $247 monthly or $1,800 annual for up to 1,250 homeowners. myhomeIQ: Open overage pricing, $0.25 or $0.20 per extra report, keeps scaling predictable. myhomeIQ: Unlimited agent connections at no extra cost make co-marketing cheap to expand. Modex: Profiles is priced pay-per-hire; the employer pays only when a hire happens. Modex: Modex Score gives one comparable number across candidates, built from production and regulatory records. Modex: States 1.47 million loan officers, 104,980 branches, $16.38 trillion in transactions, 248 MLSs.

What each record holds against them

myhomeIQ: No named CRM or LOS integration, only a general statement that databases sync. myhomeIQ: The annual plan bills $1,800 up front before the first report goes out. myhomeIQ: Seller scoring is proprietary with no published accuracy measure, trusted rather than checked. Modex: No integration of any kind appears on the site, not even an API. Modex: Neither the Profiles per-hire fee nor the Recruit subscription rate is published. Modex: The Modex Score methodology is unpublished, so hiring partly rests on an unauditable number.

Which one fits which shop

Best fit for myhomeIQ: An originator who wants a monthly homeowner equity report going out automatically and an agent partnership. hook attached to it. Best fit for Modex: A hiring manager who wants verified production history and a single score before making an offer.

What each entry concludes

myhomeIQ: myhomeIQ, run by SOA Labs, sends past clients a branded monthly home value and equity report. myhomeIQ: Predictive scoring sits on top and flags who is likely to sell within twelve months. Modex: Modex is a loan officer data and recruiting marketplace built on one idea. Modex: An originator’s claimed production should be checkable before you hire them.

The short answer

myhomeIQ finishes ahead on the published rubric, 4 to 3.5. The margin comes mostly from Return on spend. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

Who stands behind this review

MortgageTechReview

This score rests on evidence anyone can check. It also rests on the vendor's own documentation, pricing, integration pages, and ownership records. We do not claim to run every product ourselves. Nobody can. The rubric was published before this review existed. The vendor did not write this, and no vendor can buy a word of it. Every product in this category is weighted the same way.

How this was scored · Who publishes this · Dispute this score · Disclosure

Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →

The Stack Memo · free · one email a month

One email a month: what's actually worth demoing.

New reviews, category shake-ups, pricing changes we've spotted. No vendor spam, unsubscribe anytime.

No vendor spam·We never sell your address·Unsubscribe in one click

Or read the buying guides →

317 products · 15 categories · one rubric

Every mortgage tool, scored the same way.

No pay-for-play, no vendor-written listicles, no gate. Start from the category you are actually buying in.

Compare →