Skip to content
Subscribe

myhomeIQ vs HomeBinder

Lead Gen & Retention head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both

All Lead Gen & Retention head-to-heads →

myhomeIQ
SOA Labs, Inc.
4.0
HomeBinder
InspectionGo
2.8
AxismyhomeIQHomeBinder
Production impact 4.0 2.8
Functionality & depth 4.1 2.8
Integrations & ecosystem 3.2 2.6
Adoption & support 4.1 3.1
Return on spend 4.4 2.8
Overall 4.0 2.8

myhomeIQ wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

What the rubric says

myhomeIQ and HomeBinder are both scored in Lead Gen & Retention. myhomeIQ carries an overall of 4, HomeBinder an overall of 2.8. The widest gap between them is Return on spend, at 1.6 of a point. That axis measures what the spend returns, which is not the same as being cheap. myhomeIQ takes it, 4.4 to 2.8.

Where the five axes separate

On Return on spend the record favours myhomeIQ, 4.4 against 2.8. On Functionality and depth the record favours myhomeIQ, 4.1 against 2.8. On Production impact the record favours myhomeIQ, 4 against 2.8. On Adoption and support the record favours myhomeIQ, 4.1 against 3.1. On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours myhomeIQ, 3.2 against 2.6.

Pricing posture

myhomeIQ publishes pricing. Its listed model is published per-seat pricing, $247 per month or $1,800 per year plus a $200 one-time setup, enterprise. HomeBinder does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only. One of the two can be costed before a sales call, the other cannot.

Deployment and who each one targets

Deployment for myhomeIQ: Cloud, database synced from a CRM, LOS or spreadsheet upload. Deployment for HomeBinder: Cloud homeowner portal issued at closing, delivered through an Encompass API. Segment focus for myhomeIQ: Loan officers running homeowner retention and co-marketing with real estate agent partners. Segment focus for HomeBinder: Lenders wanting a low-cost post-close touch that borrowers actually open. The two entries name different buyers.

What each record credits

myhomeIQ: Real published pricing, $247 monthly or $1,800 annual for up to 1,250 homeowners. myhomeIQ: Open overage pricing, $0.25 or $0.20 per extra report, keeps scaling predictable. myhomeIQ: Unlimited agent connections at no extra cost make co-marketing cheap to expand. HomeBinder: Encompass and Salesforce listed, with a customer citing API enablement in hours. HomeBinder: More than 950,000 homeowners on the platform since 2012. HomeBinder: Borrowers get real utility, like maintenance reminders and recall alerts, not another newsletter.

What each record holds against them

myhomeIQ: No named CRM or LOS integration, only a general statement that databases sync. myhomeIQ: The annual plan bills $1,800 up front before the first report goes out. myhomeIQ: Seller scoring is proprietary with no published accuracy measure, trusted rather than checked. HomeBinder: Integration roster is mostly inspection software, showing where the parent’s business sits. HomeBinder: Only one lender, Celebrity Home Loans, is named on the lender page. HomeBinder: Publishes no recapture rate and no retention lift for lenders.

Which one fits which shop

Best fit for myhomeIQ: An originator who wants a monthly homeowner equity report going out automatically and an agent partnership. hook attached to it. Best fit for HomeBinder: Retail lenders who lose the borrower relationship the day after funding.

What each entry concludes

myhomeIQ: myhomeIQ, run by SOA Labs, sends past clients a branded monthly home value and equity report. myhomeIQ: Predictive scoring sits on top and flags who is likely to sell within twelve months. HomeBinder: HomeBinder hands a borrower a digital home record after closing, with the lender’s details attached to all. HomeBinder: The record holds documents, maintenance reminders, recall alerts and a service provider directory.

The short answer

myhomeIQ finishes ahead on the published rubric, 4 to 2.8. The margin comes mostly from Return on spend. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

Who stands behind this review

MortgageTechReview

This score rests on evidence anyone can check. It also rests on the vendor's own documentation, pricing, integration pages, and ownership records. We do not claim to run every product ourselves. Nobody can. The rubric was published before this review existed. The vendor did not write this, and no vendor can buy a word of it. Every product in this category is weighted the same way.

How this was scored · Who publishes this · Dispute this score · Disclosure

Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →

The Stack Memo · free · one email a month

One email a month: what's actually worth demoing.

New reviews, category shake-ups, pricing changes we've spotted. No vendor spam, unsubscribe anytime.

No vendor spam·We never sell your address·Unsubscribe in one click

Or read the buying guides →

317 products · 15 categories · one rubric

Every mortgage tool, scored the same way.

No pay-for-play, no vendor-written listicles, no gate. Start from the category you are actually buying in.

Compare →