Skip to content
Subscribe

LoanLogics vs Asurity RiskExec

Compliance & QC head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both

All Compliance & QC head-to-heads →

LoanLogics
Sun Capital Partners affiliate (July 2021)
4.5
Asurity RiskExec
Vista Equity Partners (Endeavor Fund), spun out of Asurity Technologies in January 2025
4.3
AxisLoanLogicsAsurity RiskExec
Production impact 4.5 3.8
Functionality & depth 4.9 4.9
Integrations & ecosystem 4.4 3.7
Adoption & support 4.1 4.4
Return on spend 4.0 4.4
Overall 4.5 4.3

LoanLogics wins 2 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

Where the two actually touch

LoanLogics and RiskExec both care about loan data accuracy, then part ways. LoanLogics reads documents, extracts data and audits loan files for defects. RiskExec takes the resulting data and tests it for regulatory and fair lending risk. The shared ground is the register a lender submits each year. Bad data on the audit side becomes bad analytics on the compliance side. That is a handoff, not a contest. A lender can improve one without moving the other at all.

Defect rate against exam findings

LoanLogics is measured by defect rate, cycle time and cost per audited loan. Its blog cites review time falling from two to four hours per file to about sixty minutes. It also cites a 98.5% quality control accuracy rate against an 87% industry benchmark. Both figures are vendor stated with no published method. RiskExec is measured by exam findings, edit counts and how a peer comparison reads. The two numbers land on different desks and in different reports.

How each product gets its data

RiskExec names ICE Mortgage Technology and MeridianLink Mortgage on its integrations page. Its April 2026 release added a path for sending loans straight from Encompass into RiskExec. LoanLogics named Encompass when it launched LoanBeam Process Automation in January 2025. Its quality management page says LoanHD connects to existing origination and document systems without naming them. Buyers should ask for the full connector list in writing. A logo wall is not an integration.

Who signs each contract

LoanLogics is bought by operations. The approver is usually a chief operating officer or a head of loan quality. The budget sits with loan manufacturing. RiskExec is bought by compliance. The approver is a chief compliance officer or a CRA officer, and the budget sits with regulatory affairs. A lender can hold both quotes without either being an alternative to the other. Anyone told to choose one has been handed a bad brief.

Owners and the money behind them

Sun Capital Partners acquired LoanLogics in July 2021 on undisclosed terms. Dave Parker is chief executive. RiskExec sat inside Asurity Technologies until January 2025, when Vista Equity Partners invested through its Endeavor Fund. RiskExec now runs standalone with Luke Wimer as chief executive and Anurag Agarwal as president. National Mortgage News reported that the Endeavor Fund typically targets ten to forty million dollars of recurring revenue. Both vendors sit under sponsor ownership with exit clocks running.

What the published numbers prove

LoanLogics says it serves more than 700 clients. Its home page claims 98% or better document automation accuracy. RiskExec says it supports more than 30% of the 50 largest banking and mortgage companies in the country. It also published the 2025 peer register one day after the CFPB release on 31 March 2026. That file held 13.5 million records from 4,766 respondents. The stated denial rate across it was 22.5%. Data delivery speed is checkable against an agency publication date. Market share claims are not.

Both quote, neither publishes

RiskExec offers a demo form and no price. LoanLogics points buyers to a sales contact on every quality management page. The Capterra directory entry lists LoanLogics from 25 dollars per user per month against zero reviews. Treat that as a directory field rather than a vendor quote. Ask LoanLogics for per loan audit pricing at three volume tiers. Ask RiskExec whether geocoding, peer data and 1071 are bundled or billed apart.

Which one to pick

A lender fighting repurchase demands and post close defects should buy LoanLogics. RiskExec will not audit a closing disclosure or grade an underwriter. A bank or nonbank preparing for a CRA or fair lending exam should buy RiskExec. LoanLogics will not draw a peer map or run a redlining assessment. Ask LoanLogics for defect rate movement at a named client over four quarters. Ask RiskExec to import a prior year file and reproduce the edits it flags.

Also in this category

Also in this category: ACES vs ComplianceEase and ACES vs LauraMac.

Who stands behind this review

MortgageTechReview

This score rests on evidence anyone can check. It also rests on the vendor's own documentation, pricing, integration pages, and ownership records. We do not claim to run every product ourselves. Nobody can. The rubric was published before this review existed. The vendor did not write this, and no vendor can buy a word of it. Every product in this category is weighted the same way.

How this was scored · Who publishes this · Dispute this score · Disclosure

Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →

The Stack Memo · free · one email a month

One email a month: what's actually worth demoing.

New reviews, category shake-ups, pricing changes we've spotted. No vendor spam, unsubscribe anytime.

No vendor spam·We never sell your address·Unsubscribe in one click

Or read the buying guides →

317 products · 15 categories · one rubric

Every mortgage tool, scored the same way.

No pay-for-play, no vendor-written listicles, no gate. Start from the category you are actually buying in.

Compare →