Jupiter vs LendingDox
Loan Origination Systems head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
Lendesk Technologies ULC
Loan Origination Systems
| Axis | Jupiter | LendingDox |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 3.6 | 3.5 |
| Functionality & depth | 3.6 | 3.5 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Adoption & support | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Return on spend | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Overall | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Jupiter wins 4 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
What the rubric says
Jupiter and LendingDox are both scored in Loan Origination Systems. Jupiter carries an overall of 3.7, LendingDox an overall of 3.5. The widest gap between them is Return on spend, at 0.5 of a point. That axis measures what the spend returns, which is not the same as being cheap. Jupiter takes it, 4 to 3.5.
Where the five axes separate
On Return on spend the record favours Jupiter, 4 against 3.5. On Adoption and support the record favours Jupiter, 4 against 3.5. On Production impact the record favours Jupiter, 3.6 against 3.5.
Pricing posture
Jupiter does not publish pricing. Its listed model is no seat fees and no annual contract; per-funded-loan and pass-through service charges, amounts not published. LendingDox does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only.
Deployment and who each one targets
Deployment for Jupiter: Cloud. Deployment for LendingDox: Cloud. Segment focus for Jupiter: US mortgage brokers and individual loan officers. Segment focus for LendingDox: Brokers and small to mid-size lenders. The two entries name different buyers.
What each record credits
Jupiter: Built-in credit and AUS with DU and LPA run directly in the platform, and no upfront. LendingDox: Roughly $30 per user makes it among the cheapest full LOS options anywhere on this list.
What each record holds against them
Jupiter: Rocket sponsors it, and Rocket is a lender you compete with or submit. LendingDox: Narrower than the platforms above it.
Which one fits which shop
Best fit for Jupiter: Independent brokers who want a modern LOS with no upfront cost, especially those already submitting meaningful. Best fit for LendingDox: Small brokers and lenders whose real bottleneck is document chasing and condition management, at a price.
The short answer
Jupiter finishes ahead on the published rubric, 3.7 to 3.5. The margin comes mostly from Return on spend. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →