Skip to content
Subscribe

Jupiter vs DigiFi

Loan Origination Systems head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both

All Loan Origination Systems head-to-heads →

Jupiter
Lendesk Technologies ULC
3.7
DigiFi
Loan Origination Systems
2.9
AxisJupiterDigiFi
Production impact 3.6 2.8
Functionality & depth 3.6 2.8
Integrations & ecosystem 3.5 2.6
Adoption & support 4.0 3.3
Return on spend 4.0 3.3
Overall 3.7 2.9

Jupiter wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

What the rubric says

Jupiter and DigiFi are both scored in Loan Origination Systems. Jupiter carries an overall of 3.7, DigiFi an overall of 2.9. The widest gap between them is Integrations and ecosystem, at 0.9 of a point. That axis measures how well it reaches the rest of the stack. Jupiter takes it, 3.5 to 2.6.

Where the five axes separate

On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Jupiter, 3.5 against 2.6. On Production impact the record favours Jupiter, 3.6 against 2.8. On Functionality and depth the record favours Jupiter, 3.6 against 2.8.

Pricing posture

Jupiter does not publish pricing. Its listed model is no seat fees and no annual contract; per-funded-loan and pass-through service charges, amounts not published. DigiFi publishes pricing. Its listed model is published flat platform fee plus usage, $3,995 per month base. One of the two can be costed before a sales call, the other cannot.

Deployment and who each one targets

Deployment for Jupiter: Cloud. Deployment for DigiFi: Cloud, with a private hosting option. Segment focus for Jupiter: US mortgage brokers and individual loan officers. Segment focus for DigiFi: Banks and lenders originating consumer, auto, small business or home equity products, not first lien residential. The two entries name different buyers.

What each record credits

Jupiter: Built-in credit and AUS with DU and LPA run directly in the platform, and no upfront. DigiFi: Published pricing: $3,995 base, $95 per user, $0.25 per application, $95 service hour.

What each record holds against them

Jupiter: Rocket sponsors it, and Rocket is a lender you compete with or submit. DigiFi: Not a residential mortgage LOS; no published TRID disclosure or agency delivery evidence.

Which one fits which shop

Best fit for Jupiter: Independent brokers who want a modern LOS with no upfront cost, especially those already submitting meaningful. Best fit for DigiFi: A lender standing up a new lending or account opening product quickly without a mortgage specific.

The short answer

Jupiter finishes ahead on the published rubric, 3.7 to 2.9. The margin comes mostly from Integrations and ecosystem. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

Who stands behind this review

MortgageTechReview

This score rests on evidence anyone can check. It also rests on the vendor's own documentation, pricing, integration pages, and ownership records. We do not claim to run every product ourselves. Nobody can. The rubric was published before this review existed. The vendor did not write this, and no vendor can buy a word of it. Every product in this category is weighted the same way.

How this was scored · Who publishes this · Dispute this score · Disclosure

Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →

The Stack Memo · free · one email a month

One email a month: what's actually worth demoing.

New reviews, category shake-ups, pricing changes we've spotted. No vendor spam, unsubscribe anytime.

No vendor spam·We never sell your address·Unsubscribe in one click

Or read the buying guides →

317 products · 15 categories · one rubric

Every mortgage tool, scored the same way.

No pay-for-play, no vendor-written listicles, no gate. Start from the category you are actually buying in.

Compare →