Jungo vs HubSpot
CRM & Lead Management head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
CRM & Lead Management
HubSpot, Inc. (NYSE: HUBS)
| Axis | Jungo | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 4.4 | 3.6 |
| Functionality & depth | 4.7 | 5.0 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 4.5 | 2.7 |
| Adoption & support | 3.7 | 4.4 |
| Return on spend | 3.1 | 3.6 |
| Overall | 4.1 | 3.9 |
Jungo wins 2 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
What the rubric says
Jungo and HubSpot are both scored in CRM & Lead Management. Jungo carries an overall of 4.1, HubSpot an overall of 3.9. The widest gap between them is Integrations and ecosystem, at 1.8 of a point. That axis measures how well it reaches the rest of the stack. Jungo takes it, 4.5 to 2.7.
Where the five axes separate
On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Jungo, 4.5 against 2.7. On Production impact the record favours Jungo, 4.4 against 3.6. On Adoption and support the record favours HubSpot, 4.4 against 3.7. On Return on spend the record favours HubSpot, 3.6 against 3.1. On Functionality and depth the record favours HubSpot, 5 against 4.7.
Pricing posture
Jungo does not publish pricing. Its listed model is per-user saas on an annual minimum, plus a separate salesforce licence. HubSpot does not publish pricing. Its listed model is per-seat saas with a free tier.
Deployment and who each one targets
Segment focus for HubSpot: Not mortgage-native.
What each record credits
Jungo: Salesforce power with mortgage logic already built, which skips much of the FSC build project. Jungo: Publishes pricing at $96 per user per month annual, $119 monthly, plus a $249 to $299. Jungo: Extensive integration reach through the underlying Salesforce platform. HubSpot: Free tier is genuinely usable, and paid plans start around $20 per user per month. HubSpot: Cleanest user experience of the general-purpose options, with fast setup measured in weeks not months. HubSpot: Excellent email marketing, sequences, and reporting out of the box.
What each record holds against them
Jungo: The published price is not the real price. Jungo: G2 reviewers score ease of use at 7.2 and quality of support at 7.6, both below. Jungo: Dependent on the Salesforce business model and pricing decisions you do not control. HubSpot: Nothing mortgage-specific. HubSpot: Pricing escalates sharply as contact counts and hubs grow. HubSpot: Platform is designed to pull you into adjacent HubSpot products.
Which one fits which shop
Best fit for Jungo: Mid-size and larger shops that already have Salesforce and want mortgage workflows without building them. Best fit for HubSpot: Small mortgage teams and brokerages prioritizing marketing sophistication over mortgage-specific workflow.
What each entry concludes
Jungo: Mortgage overlay built on top of Salesforce, in market since 2005. Jungo: Delivers mortgage CRM, co-marketing, and compliance from one login while inheriting the Salesforce platform underneath. HubSpot: General-purpose CRM and marketing platform with a capable free tier and strong inbound tooling. HubSpot: Widely adopted by small mortgage teams that want organization and email marketing without a mortgage-specific build.
The short answer
Jungo finishes ahead on the published rubric, 4.1 to 3.9. The margin comes mostly from Integrations and ecosystem. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →