STRATMOR Group vs Consolidated Analytics
Advisory & Consulting head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
Strategic Mortgage Finance Group, LLC
Consolidated Analytics, Inc. (reported Eos Partners portfolio)
| Axis | STRATMOR Group | Consolidated Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 4.9 | 3.0 |
| Functionality & depth | 4.9 | 3.2 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 4.4 | 2.6 |
| Adoption & support | 4.9 | 3.0 |
| Return on spend | 4.9 | 3.0 |
| Overall | 4.8 | 2.9 |
STRATMOR Group wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
What the rubric says
STRATMOR Group and Consolidated Analytics are both scored in Advisory & Consulting. STRATMOR Group carries an overall of 4.8, Consolidated Analytics an overall of 2.9. The widest gap between them is Return on spend, at 1.9 of a point. That axis measures what the spend returns, which is not the same as being cheap. STRATMOR Group takes it, 4.9 to 3.
Where the five axes separate
On Return on spend the record favours STRATMOR Group, 4.9 against 3. On Production impact the record favours STRATMOR Group, 4.9 against 3. On Adoption and support the record favours STRATMOR Group, 4.9 against 3. On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours STRATMOR Group, 4.4 against 2.6. On Functionality and depth the record favours STRATMOR Group, 4.9 against 3.2.
In Advisory & Consulting the rubric weights Integrations and ecosystem heaviest, at 30 percent. That is why the two overalls sit where they do.
How the weights turn axes into a score
Production impact carries 25 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures whether the tool moves volume, pull-through or cycle time. Functionality and depth carries 25 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures whether it handles the messy loans and not just the clean file. Integrations and ecosystem carries 30 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures how well it reaches the rest of the stack. Adoption and support carries 10 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures whether the team adopts it and gets unstuck. Return on spend carries 10 percent of the Advisory & Consulting score. It measures what the spend returns, which is not the same as being cheap.
Pricing posture
STRATMOR Group does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, fee structure not published. Consolidated Analytics does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, fee structure not published.
Deployment and who each one targets
Segment focus for STRATMOR Group: Independent mortgage banks, banks and credit unions at scale. Segment focus for Consolidated Analytics: Lenders, investors and servicers. The two entries name different buyers.
What each record credits
STRATMOR Group: Proprietary Technology Insight study covers POS, LOS and CRM satisfaction directly. STRATMOR Group: Peer group roundtables run jointly with the MBA. STRATMOR Group: Forty years in the market with a named senior bench. STRATMOR Group: Talks about the vendor advisory conflict openly instead of staying silent. Consolidated Analytics: Real scale in due diligence and valuation work. Consolidated Analytics: Broad business process capability alongside the advisory work. Consolidated Analytics: Established with investors as well as lenders.
What each record holds against them
STRATMOR Group: Sells vendors a subscription program that includes study data lenders contributed. STRATMOR Group: The fee for that vendor program is not disclosed anywhere public. STRATMOR Group: Produced co-branded research with a technology vendor, funding undisclosed. STRATMOR Group: Ownership structure is not published. Consolidated Analytics: Owns and sells its own mortgage technology platform. Consolidated Analytics: Systems selection offering could not be confirmed as active. Consolidated Analytics: Ownership reported only by a third-party directory, not by the company. Consolidated Analytics: No published benchmarking data.
Which one fits which shop
Best fit for STRATMOR Group: Lenders who need benchmark data few competitors hold. Best fit for Consolidated Analytics: Due diligence and valuation work rather than systems selection.
What each entry concludes
STRATMOR Group: STRATMOR holds deep data assets. STRATMOR Group: The Technology Insight study and the MBA peer roundtables produce satisfaction and loyalty figures on the exact products. STRATMOR Group: They also sell a subscription advisory service to technology vendors, including access to that study data. STRATMOR Group: They address the conflict in public rather than hiding it. STRATMOR Group: Read what they say about it and decide for yourself. Consolidated Analytics: Consolidated Analytics has real weight in due diligence and valuations. Consolidated Analytics: We could not confirm the systems selection line is still active. Consolidated Analytics: It owns and sells its own mortgage technology platform, which puts it on both sides of any technology. Consolidated Analytics: A third-party directory reports private equity backing; the company itself discloses no ownership.
The short answer
STRATMOR Group finishes ahead on the published rubric, 4.8 to 2.9. The margin comes mostly from Return on spend. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →