Skip to content
Subscribe

Uplist vs LendingTree

Lead Gen & Retention head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both

All Lead Gen & Retention head-to-heads →

Uplist
Lead Gen & Retention
3.7
LendingTree
LendingTree, Inc. (Nasdaq: TREE)
2.6
AxisUplistLendingTree
Production impact 3.6 3.1
Functionality & depth 3.3 2.3
Integrations & ecosystem 2.6 2.3
Adoption & support 4.4 2.8
Return on spend 4.4 2.1
Overall 3.7 2.6

Uplist wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

What the rubric says

Uplist and LendingTree are both scored in Lead Gen & Retention. Uplist carries an overall of 3.7, LendingTree an overall of 2.6. The widest gap between them is Return on spend, at 2.3 of a point. That axis measures what the spend returns, which is not the same as being cheap. Uplist takes it, 4.4 to 2.1.

Where the five axes separate

On Return on spend the record favours Uplist, 4.4 against 2.1. On Adoption and support the record favours Uplist, 4.4 against 2.8. On Functionality and depth the record favours Uplist, 3.3 against 2.3.

Pricing posture

Uplist publishes pricing. Its listed model is published subscription: $950 per year, or $1,650 for two years, bought through self serve signup. LendingTree does not publish pricing. Its listed model is lead marketplace, lender pays per match or click, no published rate card. One of the two can be costed before a sales call, the other cannot.

Deployment and who each one targets

Deployment for Uplist: Cloud, self serve signup. Deployment for LendingTree: Cloud marketplace, leads delivered into the lender’s CRM by post or API, nothing installed. Segment focus for Uplist: Individual loan officers and small teams running their own marketing. Segment focus for LendingTree: Lenders buying high-volume consumer mortgage inquiries to feed a call centre. The two entries name different buyers.

What each record credits

Uplist: Published price and self-serve signup: $950 per year, $1,650 for two. LendingTree: Volume switches on at once, with no build and no implementation project.

What each record holds against them

Uplist: No named LOS or CRM integration appears anywhere on the site. LendingTree: Leads are shared by design, so winning means dialing first, not being better.

Which one fits which shop

Best fit for Uplist: An officer who wants refinance watch and a listing flyer without asking corporate for budget. Best fit for LendingTree: A consumer-direct shop with licensed staff on the phone within minutes of a form submission.

The short answer

Uplist finishes ahead on the published rubric, 3.7 to 2.6. The margin comes mostly from Return on spend. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

Who stands behind this review

MortgageTechReview

This score rests on evidence anyone can check. It also rests on the vendor's own documentation, pricing, integration pages, and ownership records. We do not claim to run every product ourselves. Nobody can. The rubric was published before this review existed. The vendor did not write this, and no vendor can buy a word of it. Every product in this category is weighted the same way.

How this was scored · Who publishes this · Dispute this score · Disclosure

Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →

The Stack Memo · free · one email a month

One email a month: what's actually worth demoing.

New reviews, category shake-ups, pricing changes we've spotted. No vendor spam, unsubscribe anytime.

No vendor spam·We never sell your address·Unsubscribe in one click

Or read the buying guides →

317 products · 15 categories · one rubric

Every mortgage tool, scored the same way.

No pay-for-play, no vendor-written listicles, no gate. Start from the category you are actually buying in.

Compare →