Skip to content
Subscribe

TrustEngine vs Matic Insurance

Lead Gen & Retention head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both

All Lead Gen & Retention head-to-heads →

TrustEngine
LLR Partners
4.5
Matic Insurance
Matic Insurance Services, Inc.
4.2
AxisTrustEngineMatic Insurance
Production impact 4.7 4.3
Functionality & depth 4.8 3.7
Integrations & ecosystem 4.9 3.7
Adoption & support 4.1 4.4
Return on spend 4.1 4.5
Overall 4.5 4.2

TrustEngine wins 3 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

One charges the lender, the other pays the lender

This pairing is not really a choice. TrustEngine bills a subscription. Matic sends commission back to the lender. A lender can run both in the same quarter, and many do. The confusion comes from both vendors using the word retention. They mean different mechanics entirely.

What TrustEngine sells

TrustEngine ships MortgageCoach, a loan presentation tool. Loan officers build side by side comparisons for borrowers. The stated promise is less confusion, faster decisions and lifelong relationships. MortgageCoach dates to 1997. Sales Boomerang, founded in 2017, merged with it under LLR Partners ownership in 2023. Bob Jennings became chief executive in January 2026.

A 2026 release generates AI summaries of borrower conversations. TrustEngine describes those summaries as searchable and audit ready. The vendor states it holds SOC 2 compliance. At the 2023 merger it claimed more than 200 lender clients.

What Matic sells

Matic is an insurance agency rather than a software vendor. It describes itself as a digital insurance agency. Borrowers compare quotes across carriers during or after the loan. Matic cites more than 70 carriers on its partner page. Its consumer page cites 60 plus A rated carriers. The two counts differ across the vendor’s own pages.

Home insurance is the anchor product but not the whole catalogue. Matic also places auto, life, umbrella, pet and landlord cover. Flood, earthquake and jewellery policies appear on the same menu. Breadth matters because bundling drives the commission per household.

Where the money actually comes from

Matic states the model plainly. Insurance carriers pay Matic a commission when a borrower switches policies. The lender takes a share of that commission. Matic publishes no split. TrustEngine runs the opposite way. Its shop page lists $150 per month per user. Enterprise pricing above five users is custom. One line is a cost centre and the other is income.

What each claims and what backs it

Matic claims partners see a two to three times uptick in customer retention. It gives no method and no sample size. Consumers reportedly save an average of $970. That figure carries an asterisk on Matic’s own page. TrustEngine cites $2,327 more profit per loan, sourced to NFM Lending. All of these are vendor stated and unverified.

Ownership and 2026 moves

LLR Partners acquired MortgageCoach and Sales Boomerang in 2022. TrustEngine remains an LLR portfolio company. Matic raised $30 million from Vistara Growth in January 2025. In June 2026 Primus Capital took a minority stake. Matic simultaneously bought the Policygenius property and casualty book. That deal covered nearly 30,000 policies. Ben Madick is chief executive and co-founder.

Matic published a home insurance market report in August 2026. That report described premium growth slowing and competition returning. Softer premiums cut the commission earned on each placement. A lender modelling this revenue should treat it as cyclical.

Integration lists that do not match

TrustEngine names its stack openly. Encompass covers the LOS side, with SimpleNexus and nCino for point of sale. Its CRM list runs to eleven named vendors. Optimal Blue, Polly and Lender Price handle pricing. Matic names no LOS and no POS at all. It describes a turnkey API needing little technical lift. A lender should push for the actual trigger point in the loan file.

TrustEngine also names Arch MI, MGIC and National MI. First American, Lodestar and ClosingCorp supply fee data. Zapier covers anything outside the named list. Matic publishes none of this detail publicly.

Which one to pick

A lender trying to lift pull through on applications in hand should buy TrustEngine. It works on the conversation before the borrower decides. A lender with closed volume and thin margins should sign Matic. The commission arrives without a licence fee. Ask TrustEngine what happens to per seat pricing when headcount drops mid contract. Ask Matic for the commission split in writing and the attach rate at comparable lenders.

Also in this category

Also in this category: BankingBridge vs Down Payment Resource and BankingBridge vs Matic.

Who stands behind this review

MortgageTechReview

This score rests on evidence anyone can check. It also rests on the vendor's own documentation, pricing, integration pages, and ownership records. We do not claim to run every product ourselves. Nobody can. The rubric was published before this review existed. The vendor did not write this, and no vendor can buy a word of it. Every product in this category is weighted the same way.

How this was scored · Who publishes this · Dispute this score · Disclosure

Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →

The Stack Memo · free · one email a month

One email a month: what's actually worth demoing.

New reviews, category shake-ups, pricing changes we've spotted. No vendor spam, unsubscribe anytime.

No vendor spam·We never sell your address·Unsubscribe in one click

Or read the buying guides →

317 products · 15 categories · one rubric

Every mortgage tool, scored the same way.

No pay-for-play, no vendor-written listicles, no gate. Start from the category you are actually buying in.

Compare →