Pyro AI vs DocProbe
Documents & eClosing head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
Rocket Companies
Madison (DocProbe describes itself as part of the Madison family, alongside Madison Title, Madison CRES, Madison 1031 and LeaseProbe)
| Axis | Pyro AI | DocProbe |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 3.6 | 3.3 |
| Functionality & depth | 3.4 | 2.8 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 2.6 | 2.6 |
| Adoption & support | 3.1 | 3.3 |
| Return on spend | 3.6 | 3.3 |
| Overall | 3.3 | 3.0 |
Pyro AI wins 3 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
What the rubric says
Pyro AI and DocProbe are both scored in Documents & eClosing. Pyro AI carries an overall of 3.3, DocProbe an overall of 3. The widest gap between them is Functionality and depth, at 0.6 of a point. That axis measures whether it handles the messy loans and not just the clean file. Pyro AI takes it, 3.4 to 2.8.
Where the five axes separate
On Functionality and depth the record favours Pyro AI, 3.4 against 2.8. On Return on spend the record favours Pyro AI, 3.6 against 3.3. On Production impact the record favours Pyro AI, 3.6 against 3.3.
Pricing posture
Pyro AI publishes pricing. Its listed model is monthly platform fee plus per-page metering, published. DocProbe does not publish pricing. Its listed model is per loan processed, rates not published. One of the two can be costed before a sales call, the other cannot.
Deployment and who each one targets
Deployment for Pyro AI: Cloud, API-first. Deployment for DocProbe: Outsourced service with a document platform and LOS delivery. Segment focus for Pyro AI: Originators and servicers automating document classification and data extraction at file volume. Segment focus for DocProbe: Post-closing departments chasing trailing documents from title companies and shipping to investors. The two entries name different buyers.
What each record credits
Pyro AI: Publishes per-page pricing: $0.05 to classify, $0.25 to $1.25 to extract. DocProbe: Covers the whole trailing-document chain, retrieval through audit, indexing, and investor delivery.
What each record holds against them
Pyro AI: The 99 percent accuracy and 1,700 field claims carry no independent testing. DocProbe: No LOS or imaging integrations named, only a generic reference to your LOS.
Which one fits which shop
Best fit for Pyro AI: A servicer or originator drowning in indexing and stipulation review it currently staffs manually. Best fit for DocProbe: Lenders whose post-closing team spends its week phoning title companies for final policies.
The short answer
Pyro AI finishes ahead on the published rubric, 3.3 to 3. The margin comes mostly from Functionality and depth. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →