Pyro AI vs Asurity Propel
Documents & eClosing head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
Rocket Companies
Asurity
| Axis | Pyro AI | Asurity Propel |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 3.6 | 3.3 |
| Functionality & depth | 3.4 | 3.3 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 2.6 | 3.1 |
| Adoption & support | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Return on spend | 3.6 | 3.3 |
| Overall | 3.3 | 3.2 |
Pyro AI wins 3 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
What the rubric says
Pyro AI and Asurity Propel are both scored in Documents & eClosing. Pyro AI carries an overall of 3.3, Asurity Propel an overall of 3.2. The widest gap between them is Integrations and ecosystem, at 0.5 of a point. That axis measures how well it reaches the rest of the stack. Asurity Propel takes it, 3.1 to 2.6.
Where the five axes separate
On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Asurity Propel, 3.1 against 2.6. On Return on spend the record favours Pyro AI, 3.6 against 3.3. On Production impact the record favours Pyro AI, 3.6 against 3.3.
Pricing posture
Pyro AI publishes pricing. Its listed model is monthly platform fee plus per-page metering, published. Asurity Propel does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, demo request required. One of the two can be costed before a sales call, the other cannot.
Deployment and who each one targets
Deployment for Pyro AI: Cloud, API-first. Deployment for Asurity Propel: Cloud, LOS integrations. Segment focus for Pyro AI: Originators and servicers automating document classification and data extraction at file volume. Segment focus for Asurity Propel: Lenders and banks that treat document generation primarily as a compliance problem. The two entries name different buyers.
What each record credits
Pyro AI: Publishes per-page pricing: $0.05 to classify, $0.25 to $1.25 to extract. Asurity Propel: Versioning and audit trails are documented and framed for regulatory examinations.
What each record holds against them
Pyro AI: The 99 percent accuracy and 1,700 field claims carry no independent testing. Asurity Propel: No native eSignature or eClosing module; signing routes to DocuSign.
Which one fits which shop
Best fit for Pyro AI: A servicer or originator drowning in indexing and stipulation review it currently staffs manually. Best fit for Asurity Propel: Compliance-led shops that want documents and regulatory testing from the same vendor.
The short answer
Pyro AI finishes ahead on the published rubric, 3.3 to 3.2. The margin comes mostly from Integrations and ecosystem. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →