Proof vs SIGNiX

What the rubric says

Proof and SIGNiX are both scored in Documents & eClosing. Proof carries an overall of 4, SIGNiX an overall of 2.3. The widest gap between them is Production impact, at 2 of a point. That axis measures whether the tool moves volume, pull-through or cycle time. Proof takes it, 4.1 to 2.1.

Where the five axes separate

On Production impact the record favours Proof, 4.1 against 2.1. On Functionality and depth the record favours Proof, 4.1 against 2.1. On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Proof, 3.8 against 2.1. On Adoption and support the record favours Proof, 4.1 against 2.6. On Return on spend the record favours Proof, 3.8 against 3.1.

Pricing posture

Proof publishes pricing. Its listed model is per-transaction, published rates for business and title, custom for lenders. SIGNiX publishes pricing. Its listed model is per-user annual subscription with published standard rate.

Deployment and who each one targets

Deployment for Proof: Cloud, API, national notary network. Deployment for SIGNiX: Cloud, browser based, Flex API. Segment focus for Proof: Title agencies and businesses that need notarization plus identity verification, with lender deals priced separately. Segment focus for SIGNiX: Credit unions, title shops, banks and smaller lenders buying e-signature rather than a closing platform. The two entries name different buyers.

What each record credits

Proof: Publishes per-transaction rates, including $99 per mortgage meeting in-house and $45 on-network. Proof: Sells $4 per signer identity checks and Defend, which pure RON vendors lack. Proof: Snapdocs names Proof as its RON partner, third-party evidence of mortgage production use. SIGNiX: Published pricing: $180 per user yearly, hundred-transaction minimum billed at $300. SIGNiX: PKI-sealed signatures stay verifiable without SIGNiX, which suits long-lived loan files. SIGNiX: RON sold alongside e-signature, so notarized documents need no second vendor.

What each record holds against them

Proof: Lender pricing stays custom, so the biggest-volume buyers get the least transparency. Proof: Its own site names no LOS or POS, and no title production system. Proof: The $200 billion annual transaction value claim carries no independent audit. SIGNiX: No document generation, eNote, eVault or eRecording, so not a complete closing platform. SIGNiX: No LOS named anywhere; connectivity means building on the Flex API. SIGNiX: Mortgage is one of twelve industries, not the company’s centre of gravity.

Which one fits which shop

Best fit for Proof: A title agency that wants published RON rates and the option to use its own notaries. Best fit for SIGNiX: A lender that wants independently verifiable signatures without a per-envelope enterprise deal.

What each entry concludes

Proof: Proof is the company formerly known as Notarize, and it now calls itself an identity platform. Proof: It sells Notarize for RON, Close for eClosings, Identify and Verify for identity, and Defend for deepfake. SIGNiX: SIGNiX is a Chattanooga e-signature vendor whose distinguishing choice is cryptographic signing. SIGNiX: Signatures seal into the document with PKI and stay verifiable without going back to SIGNiX.

The short answer

Proof finishes ahead on the published rubric, 4 to 2.3. The margin comes mostly from Production impact. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.