Proof vs Pyro AI

What the rubric says

Proof and Pyro AI are both scored in Documents & eClosing. Proof carries an overall of 4, Pyro AI an overall of 3.3. The widest gap between them is Integrations and ecosystem, at 1.2 of a point. That axis measures how well it reaches the rest of the stack. Proof takes it, 3.8 to 2.6.

Where the five axes separate

On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Proof, 3.8 against 2.6. On Adoption and support the record favours Proof, 4.1 against 3.1. On Functionality and depth the record favours Proof, 4.1 against 3.4. On Production impact the record favours Proof, 4.1 against 3.6. On Return on spend the record favours Proof, 3.8 against 3.6.

Pricing posture

Proof publishes pricing. Its listed model is per-transaction, published rates for business and title, custom for lenders. Pyro AI publishes pricing. Its listed model is monthly platform fee plus per-page metering, published.

Deployment and who each one targets

Deployment for Proof: Cloud, API, national notary network. Deployment for Pyro AI: Cloud, API-first. Segment focus for Proof: Title agencies and businesses that need notarization plus identity verification, with lender deals priced separately. Segment focus for Pyro AI: Originators and servicers automating document classification and data extraction at file volume. The two entries name different buyers.

What each record credits

Proof: Publishes per-transaction rates, including $99 per mortgage meeting in-house and $45 on-network. Proof: Sells $4 per signer identity checks and Defend, which pure RON vendors lack. Proof: Snapdocs names Proof as its RON partner, third-party evidence of mortgage production use. Pyro AI: Publishes per-page pricing: $0.05 to classify, $0.25 to $1.25 to extract. Pyro AI: Ingests from IBM FileNet, Google Content Warehouse, SFTP, email, scanners and API. Pyro AI: Reads notary and endorsement stamps plus signatures, the collateral review part that stays manual.

What each record holds against them

Proof: Lender pricing stays custom, so the biggest-volume buyers get the least transparency. Proof: Its own site names no LOS or POS, and no title production system. Proof: The $200 billion annual transaction value claim carries no independent audit. Pyro AI: The 99 percent accuracy and 1,700 field claims carry no independent testing. Pyro AI: No LOS or servicing integration is named, so every downstream write gets built. Pyro AI: No parent company is named; the only corporate signal is a Mr.

Which one fits which shop

Best fit for Proof: A title agency that wants published RON rates and the option to use its own notaries. Best fit for Pyro AI: A servicer or originator drowning in indexing and stipulation review it currently staffs manually.

What each entry concludes

Proof: Proof is the company formerly known as Notarize, and it now calls itself an identity platform. Proof: It sells Notarize for RON, Close for eClosings, Identify and Verify for identity, and Defend for deepfake. Pyro AI: Pyro AI is intelligent document processing for mortgage files. Pyro AI: It ingests documents, classifies against a stated 400 plus types, extracts fields and routes exceptions to human review.

The short answer

Proof finishes ahead on the published rubric, 4 to 3.3. The margin comes mostly from Integrations and ecosystem. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.