Proof vs Asurity Propel

What the rubric says

Proof and Asurity Propel are both scored in Documents & eClosing. Proof carries an overall of 4, Asurity Propel an overall of 3.2. The widest gap between them is Adoption and support, at 1 of a point. That axis measures whether the team adopts it and gets unstuck. Proof takes it, 4.1 to 3.1.

Where the five axes separate

On Adoption and support the record favours Proof, 4.1 against 3.1. On Production impact the record favours Proof, 4.1 against 3.3. On Functionality and depth the record favours Proof, 4.1 against 3.3. On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Proof, 3.8 against 3.1. On Return on spend the record favours Proof, 3.8 against 3.3.

Pricing posture

Proof publishes pricing. Its listed model is per-transaction, published rates for business and title, custom for lenders. Asurity Propel does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, demo request required. One of the two can be costed before a sales call, the other cannot.

Deployment and who each one targets

Deployment for Proof: Cloud, API, national notary network. Deployment for Asurity Propel: Cloud, LOS integrations. Segment focus for Proof: Title agencies and businesses that need notarization plus identity verification, with lender deals priced separately. Segment focus for Asurity Propel: Lenders and banks that treat document generation primarily as a compliance problem. The two entries name different buyers.

What each record credits

Proof: Publishes per-transaction rates, including $99 per mortgage meeting in-house and $45 on-network. Proof: Sells $4 per signer identity checks and Defend, which pure RON vendors lack. Proof: Snapdocs names Proof as its RON partner, third-party evidence of mortgage production use. Asurity Propel: Versioning and audit trails are documented and framed for regulatory examinations. Asurity Propel: Same vendor sells RegCheck, testing loans against TRID, HOEPA, HPML, OFAC and NMLS rules. Asurity Propel: State-specific rules assemble packages instead of manual document selection.

What each record holds against them

Proof: Lender pricing stays custom, so the biggest-volume buyers get the least transparency. Proof: Its own site names no LOS or POS, and no title production system. Proof: The $200 billion annual transaction value claim carries no independent audit. Asurity Propel: No native eSignature or eClosing module; signing routes to DocuSign. Asurity Propel: Logo wall includes dead brand names like Ellie Mae, suggesting a stale page. Asurity Propel: No pricing, tiering or minimum volume information appears anywhere.

Which one fits which shop

Best fit for Proof: A title agency that wants published RON rates and the option to use its own notaries. Best fit for Asurity Propel: Compliance-led shops that want documents and regulatory testing from the same vendor.

What each entry concludes

Proof: Proof is the company formerly known as Notarize, and it now calls itself an identity platform. Proof: It sells Notarize for RON, Close for eClosings, Identify and Verify for identity, and Defend for deepfake. Asurity Propel: Propel is Asurity’s document generation platform: rules-driven state-specific packages, smart forms, embedded audit checks and versioning aimed. Asurity Propel: It suits lenders whose worry is defensible disclosure and closing paper, not a complete digital closing stack.

The short answer

Proof finishes ahead on the published rubric, 4 to 3.2. The margin comes mostly from Adoption and support. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.