Skip to content
Subscribe

LendingTree vs Own Up

Lead Gen & Retention head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both

All Lead Gen & Retention head-to-heads →

LendingTree
LendingTree, Inc. (Nasdaq: TREE)
2.6
Own Up
RateGravity Inc.
2.2
AxisLendingTreeOwn Up
Production impact 3.1 2.3
Functionality & depth 2.3 2.1
Integrations & ecosystem 2.3 1.6
Adoption & support 2.8 2.6
Return on spend 2.1 2.3
Overall 2.6 2.2

LendingTree wins 4 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

What the rubric says

LendingTree and Own Up are both scored in Lead Gen & Retention. LendingTree carries an overall of 2.6, Own Up an overall of 2.2. The widest gap between them is Production impact, at 0.8 of a point. That axis measures whether the tool moves volume, pull-through or cycle time. LendingTree takes it, 3.1 to 2.3.

Where the five axes separate

On Production impact the record favours LendingTree, 3.1 against 2.3. On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours LendingTree, 2.3 against 1.6. On Return on spend the record favours Own Up, 2.3 against 2.1.

Pricing posture

LendingTree does not publish pricing. Its listed model is lead marketplace, lender pays per match or click, no published rate card. Own Up does not publish pricing. Its listed model is advertising and referral compensation paid by lenders, no published rate card.

Deployment and who each one targets

Deployment for LendingTree: Cloud marketplace, leads delivered into the lender’s CRM by post or API, nothing installed. Deployment for Own Up: Cloud marketplace, nothing installed on the lender side. Segment focus for LendingTree: Lenders buying high-volume consumer mortgage inquiries to feed a call centre. Segment focus for Own Up: Lenders wanting rate shoppers who have already been screened and coached by a human advisor. The two entries name different buyers.

What each record credits

LendingTree: Volume switches on at once, with no build and no implementation project. Own Up: Advisors work the borrower first, so you get an informed, better-qualified contact.

What each record holds against them

LendingTree: Leads are shared by design, so winning means dialing first, not being better. Own Up: No published pricing or partner terms of any kind.

Which one fits which shop

Best fit for LendingTree: A consumer-direct shop with licensed staff on the phone within minutes of a form submission. Best fit for Own Up: A lender that competes on price and wants borrowers who arrive already understanding the offer.

The short answer

LendingTree finishes ahead on the published rubric, 2.6 to 2.2. The margin comes mostly from Production impact. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

Who stands behind this review

MortgageTechReview

This score rests on evidence anyone can check. It also rests on the vendor's own documentation, pricing, integration pages, and ownership records. We do not claim to run every product ourselves. Nobody can. The rubric was published before this review existed. The vendor did not write this, and no vendor can buy a word of it. Every product in this category is weighted the same way.

How this was scored · Who publishes this · Dispute this score · Disclosure

Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →

The Stack Memo · free · one email a month

One email a month: what's actually worth demoing.

New reviews, category shake-ups, pricing changes we've spotted. No vendor spam, unsubscribe anytime.

No vendor spam·We never sell your address·Unsubscribe in one click

Or read the buying guides →

317 products · 15 categories · one rubric

Every mortgage tool, scored the same way.

No pay-for-play, no vendor-written listicles, no gate. Start from the category you are actually buying in.

Compare →