Skip to content
Subscribe

HubSpot vs Follow Up Boss

CRM & Lead Management head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both

All CRM & Lead Management head-to-heads →

HubSpot
HubSpot, Inc. (NYSE: HUBS)
3.9
Follow Up Boss
Zillow Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZG)
2.7
AxisHubSpotFollow Up Boss
Production impact 3.6 2.7
Functionality & depth 5.0 2.8
Integrations & ecosystem 2.7 2.4
Adoption & support 4.4 2.8
Return on spend 3.6 2.7
Overall 3.9 2.7

HubSpot wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

What the rubric says

HubSpot and Follow Up Boss are both scored in CRM & Lead Management. HubSpot carries an overall of 3.9, Follow Up Boss an overall of 2.7. The widest gap between them is Functionality and depth, at 2.2 of a point. That axis measures whether it handles the messy loans and not just the clean file. HubSpot takes it, 5 to 2.8.

Where the five axes separate

On Functionality and depth the record favours HubSpot, 5 against 2.8. On Adoption and support the record favours HubSpot, 4.4 against 2.8. On Return on spend the record favours HubSpot, 3.6 against 2.7.

Pricing posture

HubSpot does not publish pricing. Its listed model is per-seat saas with a free tier. Follow Up Boss does not publish pricing. Its listed model is per-user saas with tiered bundles.

Deployment and who each one targets

Segment focus for HubSpot: Not mortgage-native. Segment focus for Follow Up Boss: Real estate agents and teams. The two entries name different buyers.

What each record credits

HubSpot: Free tier is genuinely usable, and paid plans start around $20 per user per month. Follow Up Boss: Genuinely excellent at lead routing, speed of follow-up, and team accountability reporting.

What each record holds against them

HubSpot: Nothing mortgage-specific. Follow Up Boss: Not a mortgage CRM.

Which one fits which shop

Best fit for HubSpot: Small mortgage teams and brokerages prioritizing marketing sophistication over mortgage-specific workflow. Best fit for Follow Up Boss: Loan officers embedded in a realtor team already standardized on it, where shared visibility.

The short answer

HubSpot finishes ahead on the published rubric, 3.9 to 2.7. The margin comes mostly from Functionality and depth. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

Who stands behind this review

MortgageTechReview

This score rests on evidence anyone can check. It also rests on the vendor's own documentation, pricing, integration pages, and ownership records. We do not claim to run every product ourselves. Nobody can. The rubric was published before this review existed. The vendor did not write this, and no vendor can buy a word of it. Every product in this category is weighted the same way.

How this was scored · Who publishes this · Dispute this score · Disclosure

Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →

The Stack Memo · free · one email a month

One email a month: what's actually worth demoing.

New reviews, category shake-ups, pricing changes we've spotted. No vendor spam, unsubscribe anytime.

No vendor spam·We never sell your address·Unsubscribe in one click

Or read the buying guides →

317 products · 15 categories · one rubric

Every mortgage tool, scored the same way.

No pay-for-play, no vendor-written listicles, no gate. Start from the category you are actually buying in.

Compare →