Skip to content
Subscribe

HomeLight vs LendingTree

Lead Gen & Retention head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both

All Lead Gen & Retention head-to-heads →

HomeLight
Lead Gen & Retention
3.6
LendingTree
LendingTree, Inc. (Nasdaq: TREE)
2.6
AxisHomeLightLendingTree
Production impact 3.8 3.1
Functionality & depth 3.3 2.3
Integrations & ecosystem 2.8 2.3
Adoption & support 3.8 2.8
Return on spend 3.8 2.1
Overall 3.6 2.6

HomeLight wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

What the rubric says

HomeLight and LendingTree are both scored in Lead Gen & Retention. HomeLight carries an overall of 3.6, LendingTree an overall of 2.6. The widest gap between them is Return on spend, at 1.7 of a point. That axis measures what the spend returns, which is not the same as being cheap. HomeLight takes it, 3.8 to 2.1.

Where the five axes separate

On Return on spend the record favours HomeLight, 3.8 against 2.1. On Functionality and depth the record favours HomeLight, 3.3 against 2.3. On Adoption and support the record favours HomeLight, 3.8 against 2.8.

Pricing posture

HomeLight does not publish pricing. Its listed model is no lender fee for registration or pre-qualification, borrower-side economics not published. LendingTree does not publish pricing. Its listed model is lead marketplace, lender pays per match or click, no published rate card.

Deployment and who each one targets

Deployment for HomeLight: Web portal, lender registers and submits clients manually. Deployment for LendingTree: Cloud marketplace, leads delivered into the lender’s CRM by post or API, nothing installed. Segment focus for HomeLight: Retail loan officers with move-up buyers blocked by a contingent sale. Segment focus for LendingTree: Lenders buying high-volume consumer mortgage inquiries to feed a call centre. The two entries name different buyers.

What each record credits

HomeLight: Removes the sale contingency and pulls the old payment out of DTI. LendingTree: Volume switches on at once, with no build and no implementation project.

What each record holds against them

HomeLight: A program you enroll in and submit to, not licensable software. LendingTree: Leads are shared by design, so winning means dialing first, not being better.

Which one fits which shop

Best fit for HomeLight: Purchase-focused originators losing move-up borrowers on debt-to-income or contingency. Best fit for LendingTree: A consumer-direct shop with licensed staff on the phone within minutes of a form submission.

The short answer

HomeLight finishes ahead on the published rubric, 3.6 to 2.6. The margin comes mostly from Return on spend. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

Who stands behind this review

MortgageTechReview

This score rests on evidence anyone can check. It also rests on the vendor's own documentation, pricing, integration pages, and ownership records. We do not claim to run every product ourselves. Nobody can. The rubric was published before this review existed. The vendor did not write this, and no vendor can buy a word of it. Every product in this category is weighted the same way.

How this was scored · Who publishes this · Dispute this score · Disclosure

Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →

The Stack Memo · free · one email a month

One email a month: what's actually worth demoing.

New reviews, category shake-ups, pricing changes we've spotted. No vendor spam, unsubscribe anytime.

No vendor spam·We never sell your address·Unsubscribe in one click

Or read the buying guides →

317 products · 15 categories · one rubric

Every mortgage tool, scored the same way.

No pay-for-play, no vendor-written listicles, no gate. Start from the category you are actually buying in.

Compare →