Down Payment Resource vs Revaluate

What the rubric says

Down Payment Resource and Revaluate are both scored in Lead Gen & Retention. Down Payment Resource carries an overall of 4.3, Revaluate an overall of 3. The widest gap between them is Functionality and depth, at 1.8 of a point. That axis measures whether it handles the messy loans and not just the clean file. Down Payment Resource takes it, 4.4 to 2.6.

Where the five axes separate

On Functionality and depth the record favours Down Payment Resource, 4.4 against 2.6. On Return on spend the record favours Down Payment Resource, 4.4 against 2.8. On Adoption and support the record favours Down Payment Resource, 4.4 against 3.1. On Production impact the record favours Down Payment Resource, 4.4 against 3.3. On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Down Payment Resource, 3.8 against 2.8.

Pricing posture

Down Payment Resource does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, enterprise licence. Revaluate does not publish pricing. Its listed model is tiered subscription by monitored contact count and seats; tiers published, dollar amounts are not.

Deployment and who each one targets

Deployment for Down Payment Resource: Cloud portals for four roles plus an Encompass integration. Deployment for Revaluate: Cloud, CRM sync or list upload. Segment focus for Down Payment Resource: Lenders serving first time, moderate income and CRA-driven borrowers. Segment focus for Revaluate: Loan officers, agents, and teams working an existing database rather than buying new leads. The two entries name different buyers.

What each record credits

Down Payment Resource: Tracks more than 2,600 programmes nationally, 74 percent offering down payment assistance. Down Payment Resource: Published Encompass integration surfaces programme matching inside the LOS. Down Payment Resource: Four role-specific surfaces: research, matching, underwriting guidelines and consumer capture. Revaluate: Does one clear job: ranks an existing database by likelihood to move. Revaluate: Long published connector list, including BoldTrail, MoxiWorks, CINC and Salesforce. Revaluate: Tier structure is public, so buyers see the deal in contacts and seats.

What each record holds against them

Down Payment Resource: No pricing published at any tier or lender size. Down Payment Resource: Programme data still needs filtering through your own overlays, and that work is yours. Down Payment Resource: Only two lender customers named: Mountain West Financial and Cherry Creek Mortgage. Revaluate: No dollar figures on the pricing page, only seat and contact counts. Revaluate: Integration list is built for real estate CRMs, with no LOS named. Revaluate: Ownership and corporate backing go undisclosed on the site.

Which one fits which shop

Best fit for Down Payment Resource: Lenders losing otherwise good borrowers at the down payment. Best fit for Revaluate: A database owner who wants to know which contacts are about to move in the next.

What each entry concludes

Down Payment Resource: Down Payment Resource keeps a database of more than 2,600 homeownership assistance programmes. Down Payment Resource: It matches borrowers to programmes, so a file short on down payment funds instead of dying. Revaluate: Revaluate calls itself a data company that reveals likely movers, and that describes the whole product. Revaluate: You point it at your database, and it scores each contact for likelihood of moving within six.

The short answer

Down Payment Resource finishes ahead on the published rubric, 4.3 to 3. The margin comes mostly from Functionality and depth. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.