Skip to content
Subscribe

Covered Insurance Solutions vs Modex

Lead Gen & Retention head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both

All Lead Gen & Retention head-to-heads →

Covered Insurance Solutions
Lead Gen & Retention
4.0
Modex
Modex, Inc.
3.5
AxisCovered Insurance SolutionsModex
Production impact 3.9 3.6
Functionality & depth 4.0 3.6
Integrations & ecosystem 4.1 2.6
Adoption & support 3.9 3.6
Return on spend 4.0 3.8
Overall 4.0 3.5

Covered Insurance Solutions wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

What the rubric says

Covered Insurance Solutions and Modex are both scored in Lead Gen & Retention. Covered Insurance Solutions carries an overall of 4, Modex an overall of 3.5. The widest gap between them is Integrations and ecosystem, at 1.5 of a point. That axis measures how well it reaches the rest of the stack. Covered Insurance Solutions takes it, 4.1 to 2.6.

Where the five axes separate

On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Covered Insurance Solutions, 4.1 against 2.6. On Functionality and depth the record favours Covered Insurance Solutions, 4 against 3.6. On Production impact the record favours Covered Insurance Solutions, 3.9 against 3.6. On Adoption and support the record favours Covered Insurance Solutions, 3.9 against 3.6. On Return on spend the record favours Covered Insurance Solutions, 4 against 3.8.

Pricing posture

Covered Insurance Solutions does not publish pricing. Its listed model is agency revenue share, no published fees. Modex does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only; profiles sold pay-per-hire, recruit sold by subscription.

Deployment and who each one targets

Deployment for Covered Insurance Solutions: Cloud, embedded in POS and servicing portals via API. Deployment for Modex: Cloud, self-service search with employer messaging. Segment focus for Covered Insurance Solutions: Lenders and servicers capturing homeowners insurance revenue and protecting escrow. Segment focus for Modex: Mortgage employers recruiting originators, plus wholesale and business development teams targeting brokers. The two entries name different buyers.

What each record credits

Covered Insurance Solutions: Names integration points concretely: Blend, Blue Sage’s LION POS, Total Expert, ICE Servicing Digital. Covered Insurance Solutions: More than 80 carriers in all 50 states, homeowners forms through flood. Covered Insurance Solutions: Labels its own dashboard figures illustrative instead of passing them off as results. Modex: Profiles is priced pay-per-hire; the employer pays only when a hire happens. Modex: Modex Score gives one comparable number across candidates, built from production and regulatory records. Modex: States 1.47 million loan officers, 104,980 branches, $16.38 trillion in transactions, 248 MLSs.

What each record holds against them

Covered Insurance Solutions: Encompass is absent from the partner list, closing off the largest origination base. Covered Insurance Solutions: No customer outcome data published, and the vendor says so itself. Covered Insurance Solutions: Ownership and funding are undisclosed, and so is the lender’s revenue split. Modex: No integration of any kind appears on the site, not even an API. Modex: Neither the Profiles per-hire fee nor the Recruit subscription rate is published. Modex: The Modex Score methodology is unpublished, so hiring partly rests on an unauditable number.

Which one fits which shop

Best fit for Covered Insurance Solutions: Servicers and lenders already running Blend, Blue Sage or ICE Servicing Digital. Best fit for Modex: A hiring manager who wants verified production history and a single score before making an offer.

What each entry concludes

Covered Insurance Solutions: Covered is a digital insurance agency built for mortgage companies, not a standalone tool. Covered Insurance Solutions: It embeds homeowners insurance shopping in the origination flow and the servicing portal. Modex: Modex is a loan officer data and recruiting marketplace built on one idea. Modex: An originator’s claimed production should be checkable before you hire them.

The short answer

Covered Insurance Solutions finishes ahead on the published rubric, 4 to 3.5. The margin comes mostly from Integrations and ecosystem. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.

Who stands behind this review

MortgageTechReview

This score rests on evidence anyone can check. It also rests on the vendor's own documentation, pricing, integration pages, and ownership records. We do not claim to run every product ourselves. Nobody can. The rubric was published before this review existed. The vendor did not write this, and no vendor can buy a word of it. Every product in this category is weighted the same way.

How this was scored · Who publishes this · Dispute this score · Disclosure

Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →

The Stack Memo · free · one email a month

One email a month: what's actually worth demoing.

New reviews, category shake-ups, pricing changes we've spotted. No vendor spam, unsubscribe anytime.

No vendor spam·We never sell your address·Unsubscribe in one click

Or read the buying guides →

317 products · 15 categories · one rubric

Every mortgage tool, scored the same way.

No pay-for-play, no vendor-written listicles, no gate. Start from the category you are actually buying in.

Compare →