ComplianceEase vs Asurity RiskExec
Compliance & QC head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
SitusAMC
Vista Equity Partners (Endeavor Fund), spun out of Asurity Technologies in January 2025
| Axis | ComplianceEase | Asurity RiskExec |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 4.5 | 3.8 |
| Functionality & depth | 4.9 | 4.9 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 4.9 | 3.7 |
| Adoption & support | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Return on spend | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Overall | 4.7 | 4.3 |
ComplianceEase wins 2 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Two exams, two different products
These tools answer different examiner questions. ComplianceEase tests individual loans against federal and state lending rules. RiskExec analyzes portfolios for HMDA, CRA, small business lending and fair lending risk. A compliance department with both problems needs both tools, or an equivalent pair. That confusion shows up constantly in this category. ComplianceEase was founded in 2001. RiskExec operates from Knoxville, Tennessee under Asurity, which lists offices in Washington and Dallas. Settle which exam findings each tool is meant to prevent before shortlisting either.
Who owns each one now
ComplianceEase belongs to SitusAMC Holdings. The purchase ran through a subsidiary called TechEssential and closed on 11 September 2020. The seller was LogicEase Solutions, the corporate parent, not LERETA. Stone Point Capital is the largest shareholder in SitusAMC, with PSP Investments taking a strategic stake announced in April 2020. RiskExec is sold by Asurity, which also sells Propel for document generation and RegCheck for loan-level compliance testing. Asurity publishes no investor or parent detail on its site. SitusAMC separately reported roughly 870,000 residential review scopes across about 460,000 loans in 2025. That scale sits behind ComplianceEase, though the figure covers due diligence services rather than software alone.
Coverage lines that barely overlap
RiskExec ships eight modules by its own count. Four cover HMDA, CRA, community development and 1071 small business lending. The rest handle fair lending, fair servicing, batch geocoding and redlining. ComplianceEase runs TRID testing through TRID Monitor, plus HOEPA Section 32 and 35 and state high-cost rules. HMDA is absent from the ComplianceEase product page list. Fair lending statistics are absent too. RiskExec calls its community development module an examiner-ready system. Batch geocoding matters more than it sounds, because bad geocodes create false redlining signals. Asurity added a fair servicing module in 2020 and released preliminary modified HMDA data to users in 2024. If both problems matter, budget for two contracts.
Statistical work against loan-level tests
The RiskExec fair lending module runs regression analysis, matched pair testing and proxy analysis. It carries military lending and servicemember status as native fields. Redlining insight draws on peer and market benchmarks. ComplianceEase reports through a RiskIndicator dashboard with five severity levels on each loan. One product builds a statistical narrative an examiner can follow. The other builds a per-loan pass or fail record that investors will accept in a pool.
ComplianceEase carries modules a bank rarely needs. Pre-Exam Portal runs mock loan-level examinations, and License Manager checks NMLS identifiers and SAFE Act status. RiskExec instead sells unlimited seats, which suits teams that pull in audit and legal staff. Asurity sells RegCheck separately for loan-level TRID and state high-cost testing. That product, not RiskExec, is the closer match to ComplianceAnalyzer.
Integrations named on each site
ComplianceEase names nineteen integration partners on its product page. Encompass, ICE Mortgage, MeridianLink, Dark Matter, Mortgage Cadence and Vesta all appear there. RiskExec names two origination systems on its integrations page. Those are Encompass by ICE Mortgage Technology and MeridianLink Mortgage. That is a far shorter list. RiskExec does say it supports direct core system integrations, without naming any core. Ask for the named list and the last certification date for each connection.
Pricing, and the evidence a buyer can check
Neither vendor publishes a price. RiskExec has no pricing page, and its site offers unlimited user licenses as a selling point. One G2 reviewer described pricing as set per module, which is worth confirming in writing. RiskExec carries a 5.0 rating from 19 reviews on G2. ComplianceAnalyzer is listed on G2 under SitusAMC with no rating displayed. Ask Asurity for a module-by-module quote and ask SitusAMC for a per-audit rate card.
Which one to pick
A bank preparing for a fair lending or CRA examination should buy RiskExec. A mortgage lender or aggregator worried about state high-cost violations should buy ComplianceEase. Institutions facing both will license both, and should budget on that basis. Ask Asurity what the 1071 module produces for a regulator submission today. Ask SitusAMC how quickly state rule changes reach production after enactment.
Also in this category
Also in this category: ACES vs ComplianceEase and ACES vs LauraMac.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →