Asurity Propel vs OneSpan
Documents & eClosing head-to-head · axis by axis, same rubric for both
Asurity
OneSpan Inc. (publicly traded on Nasdaq)
| Axis | Asurity Propel | OneSpan |
|---|---|---|
| Production impact | 3.3 | 2.6 |
| Functionality & depth | 3.3 | 2.5 |
| Integrations & ecosystem | 3.1 | 2.5 |
| Adoption & support | 3.1 | 3.0 |
| Return on spend | 3.3 | 2.8 |
| Overall | 3.2 | 2.6 |
Asurity Propel wins 5 of 5 axes. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
What the rubric says
Asurity Propel and OneSpan are both scored in Documents & eClosing. Asurity Propel carries an overall of 3.2, OneSpan an overall of 2.6. The widest gap between them is Functionality and depth, at 0.8 of a point. That axis measures whether it handles the messy loans and not just the clean file. Asurity Propel takes it, 3.3 to 2.5.
Where the five axes separate
On Functionality and depth the record favours Asurity Propel, 3.3 against 2.5. On Production impact the record favours Asurity Propel, 3.3 against 2.6. On Integrations and ecosystem the record favours Asurity Propel, 3.1 against 2.5.
Pricing posture
Asurity Propel does not publish pricing. Its listed model is quote only, demo request required. OneSpan publishes pricing. Its listed model is published: $22 per user per month billed yearly on professional, enterprise volume-based. One of the two can be costed before a sales call, the other cannot.
Deployment and who each one targets
Deployment for Asurity Propel: Cloud, LOS integrations. Deployment for OneSpan: Cloud, API, prebuilt eSignature integrations. Segment focus for Asurity Propel: Lenders and banks that treat document generation primarily as a compliance problem. Segment focus for OneSpan: Banks and lenders wanting signing, identity verification and authentication from one vendor. The two entries name different buyers.
What each record credits
Asurity Propel: Versioning and audit trails are documented and framed for regulatory examinations. OneSpan: Professional plan published at $22 per user monthly, with a no-card 30-day trial.
What each record holds against them
Asurity Propel: No native eSignature or eClosing module; signing routes to DocuSign. OneSpan: No integration partners of any kind are named, and no LOS is referenced.
Which one fits which shop
Best fit for Asurity Propel: Compliance-led shops that want documents and regulatory testing from the same vendor. Best fit for OneSpan: Regulated institutions that need signing evidence and fraud controls in the same contract.
The short answer
Asurity Propel finishes ahead on the published rubric, 3.2 to 2.6. The margin comes mostly from Functionality and depth. Same rubric, same weights, no sponsorships.
Both tools are scored on the same weighted rubric, production impact carries the most weight. Comparisons are never sponsored. Disclosure →